LTE (Long Term Evolution, aka 4G) – some key points

LTE - Long Term EvolutionLTE or 4G is the planned replacement for GSM, CDMA and 3G. It’s widely expected to usher in another period of communication harmony similar to that of the GSM era (which has now been fractured by 3G.)

Most mobile phones made today have to support a wide variety of radio frequencies, standards and antennas in order to provide users with coverage (data aswell as voice) as they move around both domestically and internationally. This includes support for Wi-Fi, Bluetooth (all versions,) GPS and possibly WiMAX and even FM radio. This increases costs as well as performance issues for the various technologies in use. Interference has to be managed aggressively in order to prevent problems like Bluetooth usage affecting GSM/CDMA/3G performance (a classic use case when wearing a Bluetooth headset.)

Click to continue reading “LTE (Long Term Evolution, aka 4G) – some key points”

iGoogle versus Netvibes

iGoogleUp until very recently I was a big fan of iGoogle, advocating it to friends and family, aswell as using it on my mobile phone. Unfortunately Google decided to ‘improve’ iGoogle and make it less usable for long time users like myself.

NetvibesI like to be able to review a dozen or so rss feeds through iGoogle, clicking through to the whole story on the actual originating website. The new iGoogle now loads click-throughs directly on the same page, expanding the rss pane to include the full specified rss content. This isn’t Opera Mini start pagewhat I want and I believe other iGoogle users will feel the same. People want to click-through to the actual site to see the content in situ with all the features and functionality of the originating site. Usually this includes related stories, more pictures, and generally a more feature rich experience.

Click to continue reading “iGoogle versus Netvibes”

“..The Patron Saint of Mobile developers..”

Whilst at the Thinking Digital 2008 conference, I had the opportunity to speak to many people including some very influential bloggers and journalists. During a conversation with Mike Butcher of UK TechCrunch, I started talking about developer communities and how important it was to support mobile application development. We discussed my experience of operator apathy towards third party developers and how much of an uphill struggle it was and still is to get people to consider the space seriously.

Immediately I was reminded of an interview I gave to ComputerWeekly, following the launch of Source O2 (an O2 business now sadly defunct.) It was part of a month long PR drive to push O2‘s commitment to mobile application developers and to deliver an i-Mode style service, which we named O2 Revolution. I’ve had the opportunity to work with the finest software developers in the World and I know what is required to make great software on virtually any platform. My exuberance and passion for the Source O2 programme and the goals we were trying to achieve, prompted the journalist to call me the developers’ Patron Saint. I immediately laughed-off the comment and used the full power of the O2 press office to ensure the article was serious and noteworthy.

Click to continue reading ““..The Patron Saint of Mobile developers..””

Mobile 2.0 – “…a second chance to get it right on mobile…”

As part of my role on a Mobile 2.0 panel at Thinking Digital 2008, I was asked for my definition of Mobile 2.0.

In the past, as a mobile industry insider, I would have repeated a pre-prepared statement, probably proclaiming a new era for mobile phones and mobile data usage. As an independent analyst and observer of all things mobile and wireless, I permitted myself a more accurate and overdue response: “Mobile 2.0 is a second chance to deliver the promise of Internet on the mobile phone.”

Click to continue reading “Mobile 2.0 – “…a second chance to get it right on mobile…””

T-Mobile’s Flext – Can anyone be bothered to compete with it?

Launched in February 2006 to much critical acclaim and then winning awards for best network tariff year after year, T-Mobile’s Flext price plan leads the mobile phone industry.

2 years on and there’s still no sign of competition from any of the other UK mobile operators, despite Flext’s popularity with customers of all ages.

So why no competition?

Flext turns traditional mobile billing models upside down, offering the customer total flexibility when it comes to any kind of phone use, be it phone calls, SMS, MMS, even email and web usage. The customer is given a notional cash allowance based on the size of the contracted monthly payment. This allowance can then be used in any fashion, more or less calls, more or less SMS, etc. No restrictions.

The UK mobile phone market is saturated to say the least. It’s hugely competitive, with operators simply peddling hard to maintain the status quo. The Flext price plan represents a tremendous challenge for the arcane, creaking and frankly obsolete billing platforms in use by the operators. Most run on mainframes with double digit ages, and fully maxed out running 24/7.

The question for the operator is, Where to invest the money? The billing system (big expense, upheaval, good chance of failure) or compete on price point and desirable phone ranges?

The answer unfortunately is the latter. Operators have suffered huge problems in the past with billing upgrades, capacity issues, adding new elements like MMS and web usage, all conspiring with a set of pre-existing conditions to scupper progress in this area. Instead it is commercially easier to buy exclusivity of the next best phone, be it the iPhone, HTC Diamond, N95 8GB etc. etc. Add into the mix increased contract lengths, getting longer if rumours are to be believed, and you have a perfect storm in T-Mobile’s favour.

Remarkable foresight and excellent technical execution means that Flext may not have any true competition for a few years to come.